If a project governance process is deemed inappropriate, what should a solution architect do?

Creating a hybrid process allows the solution architect to blend the best elements from both established methodologies and the specific needs or constraints of the project. This approach acknowledges that a one-size-fits-all governance process may not be suitable for every project and can lead to inefficiencies or resistance from stakeholders.

By tailoring the governance framework to fit the unique context of the project, the architect ensures that governance remains effective and relevant. This flexibility can enhance team collaboration and improve adherence to governance practices, as team members are more likely to engage with a process that resonates with their working style and project requirements.

In contrast, implementing strict methodologies may not take into account the unique aspects of the project, leading to pushback from the team or stakeholders who may find these methodologies inflexible. Similarly, strictly following the customer's existing process without modifications might overlook specific project challenges that require adaptation. Establishing a risk register is a valuable practice but does not directly address the governance process's suitability or appropriateness, making it less relevant in this context.